An independent archive of typography.
Topics
Formats
Typefaces

Kindle Paperwhite

Contributed by Stephen Coles on Sep 7th, 2012. Artwork published in .

6 Comments on “Kindle Paperwhite”

  1. Because these fonts have been “hand-tuned” I wonder if they would be open to allowing other, embedded fonts, which can’t all be equally tuned by hand. I wonder if it’s more likely that that setting refers to the publisher’s own choice at which of the six is best for their text.
  2. What I’m most interested in is how well some of these and old book types might perform on this high res screen that more closely emulates paper. It could be that old faces we love that don’t work well on monitors could work well here. But, I don’t think these are those faces :)

  3. What continually amazes and confuses me is the seemingly insatiable compulsion for the developers of e-readers to set type in justified columns, especially with such an apparent lack of interest in implementing any kind of hyphenation & justification algorithms that would make justified type look anywhere near acceptable.

    I could understand if they were gung-ho about justification and worked hard to make it look right, or if they ignored h&j algorithms but left-aligned all the type, but I don’t get why time after time we STILL see e-readers with horribly justified type.

  4. Mark Boyer says:
    Dec 18th, 2012 8:02 pm

    I just got my Paperwhite, and font changing doesn’t appear to work. I can’t change the font. Is it me or Amazon?

  5. Eugene Stakem says:
    Oct 29th, 2014 8:48 pm

    Where do you open publisher fonts from?

  6. The cut of Futura that comes in the Kindle is a unique one, with a tailed t. (And not the same as Futura Next.)

    I like it. When I put my copy of URW Futura in the custom fonts folder for comparison, I liked the Kindle version better, for reading on Kindle at least. The only time I read a lot with it was when I read the book Never Use Futura, as I couldn’t not.

Post a comment