The Noord-Hollands Archief has begun to digitise materials from the archives of Joh. Enschedé of Haarlem, one of the longest-existing printing companies. One work this initiative has now made accessible everywhere is the monumental 1978 edition of Dr. Charles Enschedé’s 1908 book Typefoundries in the Netherlands, translated into English and edited by Harry Carter, Netty Hoeflake and Lotte Hellinga and printed by Bram de Does. (See discussion on TypeDrawers here, here.)
The book is handset in metal type, Jan van Krimpen’s Romanée. Weighing in at 4.5kg, it includes extensive showings of historic metal types in Enschedé’s collections dating back as far as the fifteenth century, including full character sets and resettings of entire ornamented title pages and page layouts. These were mostly cast and typeset for the 1908 edition: due to the survival of the standing metal type they could be reprinted again for the 1978 edition. The paper was specified by de Does. It’s an astonishing experience seeing historic typefaces cast and printed with modern technology, frequently revealing a staggering crispness the printing technology of their time often could not show.
De Does’ design uses Romaneé with footnotes and section headings in the margin. A Lombardic capital-style C (see discussion below) is used as a bracket to mark additional information breaking into Enschedé's text. The body text is not set in columns.
Enschedé's 1893 commemoration of the foundry’s 150th anniversary has also been digitised by Google.
That’s an interesting question, and something I deliberately didn’t get into!
The character seems to be the C from Lombardic Initial No. 4 in the text shown on p. 22, known from 1503. To my eyes there seems to be a very, very slight difference in weight of the terminal bulbs sometimes, but it’s such a small one (feel free to compare) I imagine it’s just worn type or a casting/electrotype flaw (or a character made in imitation, but it seems hard to imagine why you’d bother). Anyhow, it’s not as far as I can see discussed in the text, or the colophon at the end. There are pilcrows (I assume) in their black letter no. 1 and 3 shown on p. 28. The foundry’s Lombardic Initial no. 2 is similar but not exactly the same. I’ve also added a direct link in the text per your request.
Thank you for digging up all these links! Yes, I can see the resemblance, and I agree with your assessment. Let’s assume it’s a C used in a pilcrow-like function. I’ve added the repurposed glyphs tag.
4 Comments on “Typefoundries in the Netherlands by Charles Enschedé (1978)”
Thank you, Blythwood!
Is it an established fact that the bracket-like character started life as a Lombardic initial C? It also resembles a stylized pilcrow.
That’s an interesting question, and something I deliberately didn’t get into!
The character seems to be the C from Lombardic Initial No. 4 in the text shown on p. 22, known from 1503. To my eyes there seems to be a very, very slight difference in weight of the terminal bulbs sometimes, but it’s such a small one (feel free to compare) I imagine it’s just worn type or a casting/electrotype flaw (or a character made in imitation, but it seems hard to imagine why you’d bother). Anyhow, it’s not as far as I can see discussed in the text, or the colophon at the end. There are pilcrows (I assume) in their black letter no. 1 and 3 shown on p. 28. The foundry’s Lombardic Initial no. 2 is similar but not exactly the same. I’ve also added a direct link in the text per your request.
Thank you for digging up all these links! Yes, I can see the resemblance, and I agree with your assessment. Let’s assume it’s a C used in a pilcrow-like function. I’ve added the repurposed glyphs tag.
Hello guys,
Could someone please share an updated link for the digitized copy of the 1978 edition Typefoundries in the Netherlands ?
The aforementioned link does not work anymore.
Thank you all.