An independent archive of typography.
Topics
Formats
Typefaces

César FranckPsyché album art

Contributed by Florian Hardwig  on Feb 26th, 2023. Artwork published in .

2 Comments on “César FranckPsyché album art”

  1. I don’t think that’s Cable Perfect, but rather what looks like Monotype’s Sans Serif Bold, with Kabel Light & Bold being used on the top (as far as I can tell.)

    Monotype’s face is distinguished by more extensive character sets that differ visually from Cabel Perfect’s; this includes the Futura-style t seen in the picture.

    Speaking of which, were there any phototype or dry transfer adaptations of Sans Serif?

  2. Thanks for catching this, Bryson! Yes, on second look, I agree that Neu-Kabel is not a match. In addition to the t you mentioned, its Norm weight has diamond-shaped dots (the Grob weight has square ones, but seems to be too bold). Judging from the size of the counters, the line below the title appears to be set in Sans Serif Medium. And the line above it is in Monotype’s version, too – in caps from the Medium and the Light – no? In Kabel, the leg of R starts closer to the stem.

    One detail that made me say Neu-Kabel initially is the characteristic narrow W. The glyph sets of Monotype Sans Serif shown by McGrew include three forms for this character, but none is as narrow as the one seen on the record cover.

    Top: Neu-Kabel Norm. Middle: detail from the record cover. Bottom: Monotype Sans Serif with its three forms of W.


    … but then I realized McGrew’s showing is not exhaustive. Below is a specimen of Sans Serif Bold #330 from the Monotype Catalog & Specimen Book issued by Swamp Press in 2023, which does have a narrow W:

    Maybe it was a size-specific thing – in this 1931 showing, the W in the small size is much narrower than the larger one (in “WEST”):

    Monotype Sans Serif Bold with alternative characaters in Printing Equipment Engineer, Vol. 42, Issue 1, April 1932

    Maybe Monotype retrofitted the Medium with such a narrow W at one point, too. Or maybe it’s indeed the Bold after all. Anyway, typeface credits adjusted. Kudos!

    were there any phototype or dry transfer adaptations of Sans Serif?

    No, not to my knowledge.

Post a comment