An independent archive of typography.
Topics
Formats
Typefaces

Tyson vs. Tubbs poster

Contributed by fangly  on Jan 18th, 2026. Artwork published in .

3 Comments on “Tyson vs. Tubbs poster”

  1. Can this technically be considered LTypI?

  2. Very strictly speaking, my understanding is that for the original poster, Neville Brody didn’t use fonts (for the English text), but lettering. As such, it technically wouldn’t qualify for Fonts In Use. But since I don’t know in which form the letterforms were applied – maybe Brody did indeed build himself some prototype fonts? – I gave it the benefit of the doubt.

    Also, both the poster lettering and the fonts are by Brody, and were made within a few years. As such, it’s not comparable to another case we had to reject once, in which the inscription on Trajan’s Column was presented as an example of Trajan in use. That was definitely a stretch.

    Now for the LTypI question. It’s defined as picking a typeface because its name matches the content. Even though the text matches the typeface names here, I’d argue the original posters are not a case of LTypI, simply because the typeface names came later. However, the FontShop promo included at the end do show the words set in the corresponding fonts. We thus can add the LTypI tag!

Post a comment